|Recommend This Page to a Friend||Printable Version|
|www.education-consumers.com||Phone & Fax - (423) 282-6832|
|October 2004||Volume 4, Number 10|
Charles Arthur, M.S.Ed. /
President and Executive Director / Mastery Learning Institute / Portland, OR Virginia P. Baxt, Ed.D. /
President / Education Agenda, Inc. Wayne Bishop, Ph.D. /
Professor of Mathematics / Department of Mathematics / California State University-Los Angeles William L. Brown, Ph.D. /
Director of Institutional Assessment / Lansing Community College Guy Bruce, Ed.D. /
President, APEX Consulting / Assistant Professor, St. Cloud State University Louis Chandler, Ph.D. /
Professor & Chairman / Department of Psychology in Education / University of Pittsburgh Andrea Clements,Ph.D. /
Professor / College of Education / East Tennessee State University Donald Crawford, Ph.D. /
Education Specialist / Otter Creek Institute Nathan Crow, B.A. /
School Administration Consultant / Education Consumers Consultants Network George K. Cunningham, Ph.D. /
Professor / School of Education / University of Louisville Mary Damer, M.Ed. /
Instructor & Student Teaching Supervisor / Northern Illinois University Jerome Dancis, Ph.D. /
Associate Professor / Department of Mathematics / University of Maryland-College Park Edwin J. Delattre, Ph.D. /
Professor / College of Arts & Sciences / Professor & Dean Emeritus / School of Education / Boston University Benjamin F. Eller, Ed.D. /
School of Education / Western Carolina University Lucien Ellington, Ed. D. /
Professor & Co-director, Asia Program / College of Education and Applied Prof. Services / University of Tennessee at Chattanooga John Eshleman, Ed.D. /
Apex Consulting David R. Feeney, Ed.D. /
Director of Digital Education / Fox School of Business & Management / Temple University Carol C. Gambill, M.Ed. /
Director-Special Projects / Curriculum & Instruction / Tennessee Department of Education Patrick Groff, Ed.D. /
Professor of Education Emeritus / San Diego State University Bonnie Grossen, Ph.D. /
Professor, College of Education / University of Oregon Richard Gruetzemacher, Ed.D. /
Director / Planning, Evaluation, and Institutional Research / University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Mark Y. Herring, Ed. D. /
Professor & Dean of Libraries / Winthrop University
Minds: Motivation & Learning in America's Public Schools
By David A. Goslin, PhD
Past President and CEO of the American Institutes for Research and Former Executive Director of the National Research Council’s Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education
Latham, MD: Scarecrow Press, Inc., 2003
Rising standards and accountability, by themselves, do little to increase student achievement. The task of acquiring knowledge and skills requires sustained effort by the student. Without both standards and motivation, the improved outcomes sought by school reformers are never going to happen.
For the past twenty-five years, insufficient student effort has been a major weakness in school reform initiatives. Goslin estimates that 25% of the student population wants to learn and will do so; 50% are engaged only to the point of “getting by” (avoiding social stigma or negative consequences); and 25% are not engaged at all.
Because most formal learning tasks require a significant effort on the part of the learner, the satisfaction derived from mastering the task, is rarely sufficient. Extrinsic rewards such as praise, attention, special privileges, and other forms of recognition are typically necessary for difficult or repetitive tasks.
A variety of barriers can hamper student effort. One is a widely held but self-defeating belief about the relationship between effort and ability. Young children typically learn from their parents that effort is commendable—it is a key to success. In their world, a “good” student is one who works hard and completes assignments. Middle school students, however, have learned to compare themselves to one another and apply different standards. Greater effort is associated with lesser ability. By puberty, students often worry more about peer opinion than school success. Frequently, they conceal or avoid effort because they believe it reflects badly on their ability.
By contrast, Japanese society places far greater emphasis on effort--as evidenced by the well-documented statistics on hours worked per week. Children understand from a very young age that effort is valued and is a measure of success. Thus, by fifth grade (when many American students begin to coast on ability rather than effort), a gap in test scores emerges, with the Japanese taking a lead that they will maintain through high school.
Another barrier to motivation is the scarcity of rewards for most students. Schools give recognition to high performing students but it is often the same few individuals who garner those awards year after year. Awards won in competition can be effective motivators but only for those students who have a realistic chance of attaining them. Children who are below the top tier need incentives too--especially in areas such as spelling or multiplication where practice is needed and intrinsic satisfactions may be low. Without the availability of effective incentives, the satisfactions inherent in play and entertainment can easily become overwhelming distractions.
Yet another barrier to motivation is the inefficiency inherent in so many classroom learning activities. Simply put, effort is not rewarded with accomplishment because teachers use untested and ineffective activities—often ones that have been created ad hoc. Goslin blames the problem on the high degree of local autonomy had by teachers and schools in choosing curricula and teaching practices.
Goslin argues that by using proven instructional methods and standardized lesson plans, wasted effort could be greatly reduced, producing far greater learning and satisfaction relative to effort invested. He also suggests that enhanced parental and societal support would be advantageous.
Although not explicitly discussed, Goslin’s view clearly implies the need for schools of education to equip teachers with teaching practices of proven effectiveness. To the contrary, however, most teacher training programs conceive of good teaching as the individualized application of general principles to students and situations, not the use of well-tested and polished lessons.
Goslin highlights adult attention as a key factor in motivating learners. From infancy, children crave attention, praise, and recognition of their accomplishments. For example, mastery of oral language is a monumental task requiring sustained effort, yet most children accomplish it within a few short years because their verbal expressions are rewarded with adult attention.
Optimizing student motivation and engagement will require improved cooperation of parents, teachers, schools, and society in several areas:
The broadest impediments to the sustained engagement of American students are primarily cultural: academic success is not as highly valued as it should be, and the numerous non-educational attractions that compete for the time and attention of students. As long as the public accepts the notion that aim of being “well-rounded” is an acceptable substitute for core subject mastery, it is likely that inadequate student motivation will continue to be a major hindrance to improved school achievement.
The Education Consumers Consultants Network is an alliance of experienced and credentialed educators dedicated to serving the needs of parents, policymakers, and taxpayers for independent and consumer-friendly consulting. For more information, contact J. E. Stone, Ed.D., at (423) 282-6832, or write: email@example.com
Daniel Hursh, Ph.D. /
Professor of Educational Psychology / College of Human Resources & Education / West Virginia University Carol Jago, M.A. /
English Teacher, Santa Monica High School / Director, California Reading & Literature Project / UCLA Jerry Jesness, M.A. /
ESL Teacher & Author / Los Fresnos (TX) Schools Daniel Konieczko, M.Ed. /
Science Teacher, Brunswick High School / Brunswick, ME Martin Kozloff, Ph.D. /
Watson Distinguished Professor / School of Education / University of North Carolina at Wilmington Rob Kremer, M.B.A. /
President / Oregon Education Coalition Elaine K. McEwan-Adkins, Ed.D. /
Author & Consultant / McEwan-Adkins Group Richard P. Phelps, Ph.D. /
Economist & Author Michael Podgursky, Ph.D. /
Professor and Chairman / Department of Economics / University of Missouri J. Martin Rochester, Ph.D. /
Curator's Distinguished Teaching Professor / Department of Political Science / University of Missouri-St. Louis Linda Ross, Ph.D. /
Director & Instructional Design Specialist / Archimedia eLearning Solutions Valerie Copeland Rutledge, Ed.D. /
Associate Professor / College of Education / University of Tennessee at Chattanooga / Member, Tenessee Board of Education Douglas Sears, Ph.D. /
Professor & Dean / School of Education / Boston University Mark C. Schug, Ph.D. /
Professor & Director / Center for Economic Education / University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Lewis Solmon, Ph.D. /
Dean Emeritus / UCLA Graduate School of Education / Executive Vice President, Education / Director, Teacher Advancement Program / Milken Family Foundation Robert Spangler, Ed.D. /
President / Spangler & Associates, LLC J. E. Stone, Ed.D. /
Professor / College of Education / East Tennessee State University Sara Tarver, Ph.D /
Professor / School of Education / University of Wisconsin-Madison John Towner, Ph.D. /
Professor Emeritus / Woodring College of Education / Western Washington University Herbert Walberg, Ph.D. /
Research Professor of Education & Psychology / Emeritus / College of Education / University of Illinois-Chicago John T. Wenders, Ph.D. /
Professor of Economics, Emeritus / University of Idaho Richard Western, Ph.D. /
Professor (retired) / School of Education / University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee